Discussion:
OT: How long does Google groups keep their old usenet archive?
(too old to reply)
Nomen Nescio
2024-10-11 08:51:41 UTC
Permalink
I'm not asking when/if they decide to drop all old posts, but
currently, they still support their archive and I wonder how far
back
it goes.
At one point I had heard (read?) 25 years and I played around
with
this without ever really coming to closure. Today, I did a bunch
of
narrowing searches for "Sawfish" posts and the earliest on I
found was
6/6/98. This is approximately 26 years 4 months. Also, the
context of
this post *looks* as if I had already been posting for a while,
leading me to think that nothing earlier still exists due to a
cut-off
date.
Too, I had posted much earlier--maybe as early as '94?--under
two
different handles, but searches for posts under those handles
turned
up nothing.
Does anyone have definitive info on the earliest dates of RST
posts
they can find?
I think google's archive is as close to canonical as is publicly
available, but I could be wrong. I have archives locally in a
database from 2003 forward. It's nice because it affords some
better searching capabilities than google groups interface. But,
it's also a bit of extra maintenance, and if my provider reindexes
messages I have to adjust. I had hoped archive.org would either
buy Google's archive or Google would donate it. Honestly,
text-only archives of usenet is a drop in the bucket storage-wise.
It seems like a no-brainer to keep messages from the dawn of the
internet safe from a fickle company like Google.
The wayback machine (archive.org) has been officially hacked and is
currently out of action.

https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1g04916/internet_archive_hacked_
data_breach_impacts_31/?rdt=58719

Democrats are trying to erase evidence of their criminal activity.
D
2024-10-11 11:58:50 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Nomen Nescio
I think google's archive is as close to canonical as is publicly
available, but I could be wrong. I have archives locally in a
database from 2003 forward. It's nice because it affords some
better searching capabilities than google groups interface. But,
it's also a bit of extra maintenance, and if my provider reindexes
messages I have to adjust. I had hoped archive.org would either
buy Google's archive or Google would donate it. Honestly,
text-only archives of usenet is a drop in the bucket storage-wise.
It seems like a no-brainer to keep messages from the dawn of the
internet safe from a fickle company like Google.
The wayback machine (archive.org) has been officially hacked and is
currently out of action.
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1g04916/internet_archive_hacked_
data_breach_impacts_31/?rdt=58719
Democrats are trying to erase evidence of their criminal activity.
(using Tor Browser 13.5.7)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=archive.org+ddos
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=blackmeta
Post by Nomen Nescio
...
Loading...