Usenet gateways for QSL?

[h***@invalid.com]

Which m2news gateways are still working?

[Onion Courier]

***@invalid.com wrote:
>
> Which m2news gateways are still working?

Dizum is working and maybe Neodome, which I haven't tested in a long time.

[h***@invalid.com]

On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC), Onion Courier
<***@oc2mx.net> wrote:

>***@invalid.com wrote:
>>
>> Which m2news gateways are still working?
>
>Dizum is working and maybe Neodome, which I haven't tested in a long time.

Thanks.

I'm having some problems and I don't know if it's my QSL or maybe a
dead gateway.

Anyone else kinow if neodome is working or not?

[Nomen Nescio]

In article <***@4ax.com>
***@invalid.com wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC), Onion Courier
> <***@oc2mx.net> wrote:
>
> >***@invalid.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Which m2news gateways are still working?
> >
> >Dizum is working and maybe Neodome, which I haven't tested in a long time.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'm having some problems and I don't know if it's my QSL or maybe a
> dead gateway.
>
> Anyone else kinow if neodome is working or not?

Neodome works very well.

[h***@invalid.com]

On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:26:01 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
<***@dizum.com> wrote:

>In article <***@4ax.com>
>***@invalid.com wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC), Onion Courier
>> <***@oc2mx.net> wrote:
>>
>> >***@invalid.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Which m2news gateways are still working?
>> >
>> >Dizum is working and maybe Neodome, which I haven't tested in a long time.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I'm having some problems and I don't know if it's my QSL or maybe a
>> dead gateway.
>>
>> Anyone else kinow if neodome is working or not?
>
>Neodome works very well.

Okay.

Now I know neodome ain't my problem for QSL posts not showing.

Thanks.

[U***@[127.1]]

***@invalid.com wrote:> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025

> Now I know neodome ain't my problem for QSL posts not showing.
>
> Thanks.
>

you would need something more than the word of a stranger!!!

[SEC3]

On 2/4/25 02:03, Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1] wrote:
> ***@invalid.com wrote:> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025
>
>> Now I know neodome ain't my problem for QSL posts not showing.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> you would need something more than the word of a stranger!!!
>

But you're a stranger as well. So by your logic the OP ought not listen
to you either.

--
SEC3

YAMN Help Tutorial - https://www.sec3.net/yamnhelp/

[h***@invalid.com]

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 07:15:43 -0500, SEC3 <***@sec3.net> wrote:

>On 2/4/25 02:03, Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1] wrote:
>> ***@invalid.com wrote:> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025
>>
>>> Now I know neodome ain't my problem for QSL posts not showing.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> you would need something more than the word of a stranger!!!
>>
>
>But you're a stranger as well. So by your logic the OP ought not listen
>to you either.

I make it a habit of Plonking! such angry, demeaning fools. Their dogs
died. Their wives left them. So, it figures their anger is totally
eating them up if they don't get to spit it out at someone. That someone
is us.

They can't last with such anger on a web forum because they are banned
immediately after spewing their anger and denigration toward other
posters. So, to repeat myself, pretty much unregulated Usenet is their
only form of release for the painful hate inside that is eating them up.

In short, they're LUSERS.

[[e-mail]]

On 04 Feb 2025, ***@invalid.com posted some
news:***@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 07:15:43 -0500, SEC3 <***@sec3.net> wrote:
>
>>On 2/4/25 02:03, Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1] wrote:
>>> ***@invalid.com wrote:> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025
>>>
>>>> Now I know neodome ain't my problem for QSL posts not showing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> you would need something more than the word of a stranger!!!
>>>
>>
>>But you're a stranger as well. So by your logic the OP ought not listen
>>to you either.
>
> I make it a habit of Plonking! such angry, demeaning fools. Their dogs
> died. Their wives left them. So, it figures their anger is totally
> eating them up if they don't get to spit it out at someone. That someone
> is us.
>
> They can't last with such anger on a web forum because they are banned
> immediately after spewing their anger and denigration toward other
> posters. So, to repeat myself, pretty much unregulated Usenet is their
> only form of release for the painful hate inside that is eating them up.
>
> In short, they're LUSERS.

takes one to know one

[Nomen Nescio]

On 2/3/2025 3:10 PM, ***@invalid.com wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:26:01 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
> <***@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <***@4ax.com>
>> ***@invalid.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC), Onion Courier
>>> <***@oc2mx.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ***@invalid.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Which m2news gateways are still working?
>>>>
>>>> Dizum is working and maybe Neodome, which I haven't tested in a long time.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> I'm having some problems and I don't know if it's my QSL or maybe a
>>> dead gateway.
>>>
>>> Anyone else kinow if neodome is working or not?
>>
>> Neodome works very well.
>
> Okay.
>
> Now I know neodome ain't my problem for QSL posts not showing.
>
> Thanks.


Lots of other reasons why your posts are not showing.

Maybe post here your QSL template.